Instant Access To 100,000+ Essays!

“Philip Larkin is the precise observer of daily life and class distinctions, the recorder of the ordinary reaching beyond observation.” Although I agree that Philip Larkin was on ‘observer of daily life and class distinctions’, I am not sure about how precise his observations actually were. Philip Larkin was highly aware of the world surrounding him. He seemed to be an introvert, and looked at the world like an outsider looking in. I think that helped him judge the situations more correctly as he was not directly involved himself. However, his was also plagued with pessimism, to him it seems, the glass was always half empty. This means that Larkin took away all the joy in his observations and replaced it with negativity, this leaves us unsure as to how precise his observations actually were. In the first verse, Larkin begins his train journey. He seems to be annoyed at the start of the poem and the images he conveys of the state of the train lead us to believe that Larkin was not happy, “All windows down, all cushions hot, all sense of being in a hurry gone”. His observations of the train are not particularly detailed, it is the outside world that interests him, the annoyance of Larkin at the beginning