 |

View our papers...

This is a short summary of this paper!
Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!
|
Fandom... Frenzied Crowd, Obsessed Loner or In Between?
Fans have been criticised heavily via the press as well as academic works. They have been given evil associations and stereotypes hugely based on the news coverage and opinions of extreme cases such as that of Mark David Chapman and John Hinckley. Joli Jenson mentions these cases briefly to give an example of the obsessive loner type as opposed to the frenzied crowd member in her academic piece, ‘Fandom as Pathology: The consequences of Characterisation’. Again, both these definitions are negative opinions on the fan, but the text also touches on the way some people blame the ‘media influences for fan obsession’ (Jenson; 92; 10) and these characterisations. The essay states that fans are ‘a response to the star system’ meaning that ‘passivity is ascribed to the fan…’ (Jenson; 92; 10) This essay seeks to explore just how true it is to say that fans are passive and ‘entirely convinced by media artifice’. An analysis of a site dedicated to the film star Ryan Phillippe, created by a fan, as well as references to others fan sites such those dedicated to James Dean will be used to help achieve this.
The argument Ruddock has given in the question to this essay is a fairly strong one, and has been commented on by
Approximate Word count = 1821
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|