Instant Access To 100,000+ Essays!

The movie depicted twelve men from different backgrounds and cultures. They communicated differently, as in getting their point across. This caused them to get frustrated and angry, that is where the title of the movie comes in. I feel the movie could have been setup a lot of different ways. The one juror who voted not guilty, really didn’t have a sound reason why he voted the way he did. His initial argument was the evidence was to perfect. He felt that there was no way a case could be this obvious. In my opinion he was trying to get the other jurors to look at the scenario “What if”. After a while this juror brings out more valid points. He questioned the crippled man’s testimony. He did not believe the man saw the young man running down the stairs as he had stated in court. The juror did a time-line experiment in the room to show the other jurors that the man’s testimony did seem unrealistic. This wa