|
Vivisection
Vivisection is both immoral and unjustifiable – Discus
I am strongly against vivisection. In this modern world there is no place for this barbaric practice that is ‘animal testing’. This is a highly sensitive issue on which many members of the public are un-decided. Animal testing sounds so innocent and may appear to be necessary, however the reality is quite different.
Supporters of vivisection argue that animals are anaesthetised during procedures. Polly Toynbee from ‘The Guardian’ states that “animals in experiments are anaesthetised” whereas the ‘Animal Aid’ leaflet informs us that “two thirds will receive no anaesthetic during procedures”. The ‘Guardian’ article offers little or no evidence to substantiate its claim, and offers us no statistics, un-like the ‘Animal Aid’ source. It is based on opinion not on fact. The ‘Animal Aid’ leaflet gives us numerical evidence (two thirds), and also offers pictures, to add weight and back up its argument.
The next claim is again from Polly Toynbee and ‘The Guardian’. The journalist makes her point that vivisection is morally justifiable by saying “Sorry, I think a dying people are more important than dumb animals”. This is a
Approximate Word count = 822
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Vivisection Professional Papers: |
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|