 |

View our papers...

This is a short summary of this paper!
Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!
|
Why we should not open the Artic Oil reserves
The consequences of oil field development include: blocking or disturbing wildlife, loss of subsistence hunting opportunities, increased predation by artic fox, gulls and ravens on nesting birds due to introduction of garbage as a consistent food source, alteration of natural drainage patterns (causing changes in vegetation), deposition of alkaline dust on tundra along roads, altering vegetation, local pollutant, haze and acid rain from nitrogen oxides, methane and particulate emissions, and the contamination of soil and water in the case of oil or fuel spills.
They argue that only 8% of the Artic National Wildlife Refuge would be considered for exploration.
Fact: The ANWR is the largest unit in the National Wildlife Refuge System. The refuge is America’s finest example of an intact naturally functioning community of artic/subartic ecosystems. The Artic Refuge is the only area on Alaska’s North Slope where petroleum development is specifically prohibited by Congress. The rest of the region is available for oil and gas development. (1.4 million barrels of fuel are extracted daily) Between 1980 and 1994 the North Slope field development contributed over $50 billion to the nation’s economy, so it is unreasonable to
Approximate Word count = 1024
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Why we should not open the Artic Oil reserves Student Papers: |
|
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|