 |

View our papers...

This is a short summary of this paper!
Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!
|
Epicurianism vs. Aristotle
Lucretius & Epicurianism vs. Aristole on Emotions
Both Aristotle and Lucretius try to pin down what makes a human life truly human. Aristotle makes a distinction between the good, virtuous, human life and presumably the bad, unvirtuous, human life. For him, this distinction was necessary because he believed that the quality of human life determined the nature of the afterlife. A virtuous life was rewarded with a happy afterlife, and vice versa. Everybody wishes to be happy, and being happy typically includes things or experiences considered pleasurable. Descriptions of pleasurable and unpleasurable things involve an appeal to emotions. Being kissed by a girl is pleasurable, and may be associated with emotions of love or lust. Getting punched in the face is not pleasurable and may be associated with emotions of hatred, fear, anger, resentment. Emotions tend to affect our reaction to events that happen. Aristotle writes in the Rhetoric, “The emotions [pathe] are those things through which, by undergoing change, people come to differ in their judgements.”(pg 121) The emotion of hatred felt after getting punched in the face, affects one’s judgments in that they might punch back or never speak to that person again. In other
Approximate Word count = 1167
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|