Instant Access To 100,000+ Essays!

Religion has long been the subject of speculation and theory. The question of the origin of religion in the human race still remains one of the insoluble mysteries confronting the mind of man. Through this essay I will compare the views of two founding fathers of sociology, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber to see how their views on religion differ. Max Weber's sociology is the basis of scientific sociology of religion in a sense of typological and objective understanding. Rejecting Karl Marx's evolutionary law of class society, or Emile Durkheim's sustained law of moral society, Weber established the understanding sociology of the subjective meaning of religious action or inaction. To build such knowledge of the understanding objective, he found the methodology of the idyllic type and the elective similarity of connecting relationships. Weber "elaborated a set of categories, such as types of prophecy, the idea of charisma (spiritual power), routinization, and other categories, which became tools to deal with the comparative material; he was thus the real founder of comparative sociology." 1 Weber holds that there is no universal law of society as supposed in natural science, or the law of history which determines the course of the