 |

View our papers...

This is a short summary of this paper!
Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!
|
Zero Tolerance Issues - Rough draft
The makers intent of Zero Tolerance is not completely known, as the application of it at local levels did was enacted with local school district discretion. With wording that provided for some discretion, violence consequences meted out were often extreme. The words Zero tolerance did not appear in the "Federal Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994". States were required to comply with the act in order to retain federal funds. Schools complied by removing any student who brings a firearm to school. School districts went well beyond the requirement of “immediate removal of students who bring a firearm to school (or other location controlled by a school) (Dunn, 2002; U.S. Department of Education). Mandatory one year suspensions occurred that were not part of the intent to keep schools safe. Students were being expelled for having nail files, key ring fobs, or other innocent items. Minneapolis schools have suspended more than 500 kindergartners over the past two school years for fighting, indecent exposure and "persistent lack of co-operation," among other offenses. Statewide, Minnesota schools have suspended nearly 4,000 kindergartners, first- and second- graders, most for fighting, disorderly conduct and the like (Toppo,2003). Wh
Approximate Word count = 1612
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|