 |

View our papers...

This is a short summary of this paper!
Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!
|
Bishop Taken As A Pawn
As described by William Perkins in “On the Identification of a Witch,” there were very few, though key, forms of evidence that could lead to a person’s conviction of performing witchcraft. If applied properly to a trial, then the accused could only be convicted using what Perkins termed ‘true proofs.’ In the trial of one of the accused Salem witches, Bridget Bishop, it seems as if the actual conviction was based on what Perkins called ‘less sufficient proofs’ and ‘presumptions.’ That means that the guidelines given by Perkins were used inaccurately during the examination of Bridget Bishop and so led to the conviction of a person who was more than likely innocent.
The main argument of Bridget Bishop being a witch was based on spectral evidence that should only have been submitted as a less sufficient proof. Mary Walcott and her brother, Jonathan, state that the latter “struck her [i.e., Bishop’s] appearance and saw that he had tore her coat in striking and heard it tear. Upon some search in the Court, a rent that seems to answer what was alleged was found” (385). At the time of the attack upon Jonathan Walcott, Bishop was said to be nothing more than an apparition. In this case, the evidence should h
Approximate Word count = 975
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Bishop Taken As A Pawn Student Papers: |
|
Want to view this paper along with 100,000 other term papers, essays, and book reports?
Instant access, single user memberships can be purchased online with a credit card or online check!
|
 |

Topics

Instant Access!
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Rad Essays
|